home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- REVIEWS, Page 65BOOKSRocks on the Royal Road
-
-
- By MARTHA DUFFY
-
- WHO: PRINCESS DIANA
- WHAT: The Latest in the World's Greatest Soap Opera
-
- THE BOTTOM LINE: Three best-selling bios, all claiming
- that the Waleses are at war, contend the marriage is over.
-
- Books on the Prince and Princess of Wales have been a
- quiet cottage industry since the couple married with fanfare and
- romance in 1981. Last year, their 10th anniversary, saw a spate
- of them, prettily illustrated and saying roughly the same thing:
- it may be an odd marriage, but it works for them. What a
- difference a year can make. Now there are three new biographies
- of Diana, all claiming the union is dead, a disaster, a sham.
- And as usual, woe is what sells. Andrew Morton's Diana: Her True
- Story (Simon & Schuster; $22) tops the best-seller lists; Lady
- Colin Campbell's Diana in Private: The Princess Nobody Knows
- (St. Martin's Press; $19.95) and Nicholas Davies' Diana: A
- Princess and Her Troubled Marriage (Birch Lane Press; $21.95)
- are on the charts too.
-
- Morton's is the headliner because his sources include
- Diana's brother Charles and Carolyn Bartholomew, a close friend.
- It may be that the impetuous princess, despairing of the
- prince's love, got sick of all those saccharine tomes and
- decided to get her real story out. The result is avidly
- pro-Diana. But was it worth it -- publicizing the distasteful
- bouts with bulimia, the pitiful suicidal gestures, the shouting
- matches in which she shows up as a fishwife?
-
- There is no evidence that the princess or her intimates
- had anything to do with the other biographies. For admirers of
- Prince Charles, Campbell's is the choice. Her sources are
- something of a mystery, but the citations are unintentionally
- hilarious: "an aristocrat whose brother-in-law is a senior
- courtier," "a titled schoolmate of Diana's," "a famous
- socialite." Davies' is the most balanced account but also the
- vaguest. The books read as if written in haste, and they contain
- many discrepancies.
-
- But the outlines are clear enough. Neither the prince nor
- the princess got much parental love. The best part of Morton's
- book is the simple, affecting account by Diana's brother of
- their childhood, ruptured when their mother ran off with another
- man. Prince Charles saw his mother an hour a day -- 30 minutes
- in the morning, 30 minutes at night. If she was around.
-
- Charles dithered his way through a lengthy list of girls,
- some suitable, some not. But Camilla Parker-Bowles, one that
- got away early and married another, has remained his very dear
- friend -- and Diana's nemesis. In Morton's book she is depicted
- as a schemer, vetting the prince's girls, not for their
- potential as royals but "to see how much a threat they posed to
- her own relationship." When the naive Diana said she didn't
- enjoy hunting, Camilla, a horsewoman, brightened at once. Then
- there was the discovery of Fred and Gladys -- the pet code names
- by which Charles and Camilla communicated -- gifts, flowers,
- notes.
-
- In Campbell's book Diana is the schemer and Charles the
- hapless one: "She knew he wasn't a scrap interested in her, but
- she also saw that he was vulnerable." Diana got herself invited
- to royal occasions by making friends with Lady Sarah
- Armstrong-Jones, Princess Margaret's daughter. Whatever the
- reality was, Diana expected that when they were married, her
- husband would devote a great deal of time to her. She was
- cruelly disappointed. Charles was chilly, his routine masculine
- and inflexible.
-
- The birth of Prince William in 1982 brought the couple
- closer together; Prince Harry's arrival in 1984 did not. Charles
- wanted a girl and, according to Morton, even objected to the
- infant's "rusty hair," a Spencer family trait. The couple were
- now battling constantly. Drama came naturally to Diana. Charles
- loathed confrontation, and his retreat to a virtually separate
- life in Gloucestershire, not far from Parker-Bowles, began.
-
- For a while Diana pined and battled weight loss. Then
- around 1986 she got effective treatment for her disease and,
- through Fergie and Prince Andrew, consulted an astrologer. The
- celestial message was simple: Do something positive with your
- sufferings. She did and, as Campbell says, "the Royal Family's
- answer to Mother Teresa . . .Diana the Good was born." Always
- magic in public, Diana turned much of her attention to charities
- involving the suffering, the dying. Her work has transformed her
- image from a lovely clotheshorse to a unique figure: a woman who
- uses her glamour and power to help others.
-
- The public worldwide is smitten. Poll after poll puts her
- on top of most-admired, most-beautiful and most-popular royal
- lists. Closer to home, that is not the case. If her husband
- admires her efforts for AIDS victims and drug addicts, he keeps
- it to himself. By her in-laws, she is watched "in doubtful and
- often jealous silence," writes Morton. "The world judges that
- she has dusted off the dowdy image of the House of Windsor."
- But inside it, "she is seen as an outsider and a problem. She
- is tactile, emotional, gently irreverent and spontaneous." Adds
- Davies: "Basically separated from her husband and most of her
- royal in-laws, she has yet managed to carve out an empire for
- herself."
-
- What empire? Diana is the dominant partner in what is left
- of the marriage. In avoiding her, Charles has to a degree
- withdrawn from his sons. The boys palpably adore their mother,
- who lavishes time and affection on them. Was the Morton book not
- the impetuous blowout it seems to be but a prelude to divorce?
- In her more florid moments, Diana has said she may never be
- Queen. (A current story around London is that if Elizabeth II
- lives another 20 years, Charles may stand aside in favor of
- William.) But Diana has reportedly told the Queen she would
- never let her down, and her mother-in-law's commands are the
- only ones she follows unfailingly. The late Earl Mountbatten,
- one of Charles' many mentors, once said nothing guarantees the
- monarchy's survival; it is only as strong as any given King. So
- the drama plays like any good soap opera: you simply have to
- stay tuned.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-